After taking a cautious stance on armed intervention in Libya's civil war, Obama ordered the attacks citing the threat posed to civilians by Moamer Kadhafi's forces and a UN-mandated no-fly zone endorsed by Arab countries.I believe it, since we are the world police we might also be intervening elsewhere. Right? Hmm, no oil in those other African nations? GET. OUT!
"We must be clear: actions have consequences, and the writ of the international community must be enforced," Obama told reporters while on an official visit to Brazil Saturday.
Apparently, intervening in any of these countries by Democrat Presidents happens to be an impeachable offense!
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation," he insisted.Yeah? Well the founders didn't know shit about our oil problems when they wrote that shit Kucinich?! I am pretty sure they didn't have to fork out nearly $4 a gallon for their SUVs fucknutz so Obama gets to go in there and bomb that Quawdaffy? KaDaffi? Qadiffi? Kwaddafi? Quacky the blanketed duck the HELL OFF OUR OIL!!! UUUUUU SSSSSSSS AAAAAAAAA!!!!
"While the action is billed as protecting the civilians of Libya, a no-fly-zone begins with an attack on the air defenses of Libya and Qaddafi forces. It is an act of war. The president made statements which attempt to minimize U.S. action, but U.S. planes may drop U.S. bombs and U.S. missiles may be involved in striking another sovereign nation. War from the air is still war."
"Congress should be called back into session immediately to decide whether or not to authorize the United States’ participation in a military strike. If it does not, the action of the President is contrary to U.S. Constitution. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution clearly states that the United States Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not. That was the Founders’ intent,"
But seriously, this is like reason number 7,674 of why Obama's administration is really just more of the same ole, same ole for this millennium. I am really struggling to cite anything, anymore, that sets him apart from Bush aside from the actually passing of some semblance of health care policy, sort of. To celebrate this let's go back to a previous post I wrote in 2008 called, "This day has FINALLY come." If you recall, this moron "blogger" was quite pro-Obama and even went as far to 'endorse him for President.' While I am pretty sure my endorsement surely was the final straw that got him elected I would now like to turn my cynical and all knowing eye inward a moment and attack myself. Which seems oddly appropriate when talking about Democrats in this day and age.
Now, I was quite entertained by the fairly vicious campaign then and remember feeling pretty excited that the official end of the Bush years was about to dawn.
Marvelous, it is truly exciting as the eight year nightmare is in it's death throes and even if McCain somehow miracles his ass (or steals it like 2000) into the White House it still cannot be as bad as it has been these last eight years. Can it?I think this still holds true and with the continued turmoil, largely remaining from the Bush years, as bad as it has seemed it certainly would have been much different with McCain in office. I can say that confidently as there is simply no way to prove it without traversing into a hypothetical, alternate universe where McCain did win and Palin is really an important member of our federal government. *shudders* That said, I wonder if the only real difference might have been less health care debate and increased deregulation of wall street to solve the financial crisis. Likely, and again total unprovable conjecture, worsening the "recession" into full on "depression." Or so I like to tell myself to justify my own naive belief that voting for asshole, centrist, compromising, spineless democrats is somehow better than voting for shrill, paranoid, asshole republicans who govern from comical, fantastical points of view better served by fiction.
Anyway, back in 2008 I spent a chunk of time trying to convince the hypothetical, independent voter that I was pretending read my blog to help make their electoral decision (which alone is a funny notion by itself) by saying:
I support independent people too and was strongly considering voting for Nader again this year so if you are about voting your beliefs I think that's just great! I know Obama is no miracle, shit ain't going to magic itself right over night, we're not going to just see Iraq end, universal healthcare isn't going to suddenly appear and Socialism isn't suddenly going to take over the government and economy. This is history happening right before you and you need to do is simply mark a piece of paper to take part. A piece of paper that says, "I am interested in the best possible choice and potentially making this place look like America again!" rather than an empty gesture for a third party that, very sadly, won't even get near the 5% they need. I know this because I did that in 2000. Normally, I nod in agreement with that whole lesser of two evils ideal but this time, maybe for the first time, it may actually not be true. I mean this for THIS election, this particular time...Lets all vote third party next time!Oh, the hope! The sheer wish that, not unlike the cartoon in my previous post, I was going to get the Progressive Fantasy I thought I wanted to vote for! We certainly got some good speeches and I have to say that I especially liked his speech after Tuscon, and his state of the unions have not been all bad. I can be proud that he sounds like a leader, looks like a leader and generally a lot of what he's attacked for (socialist, Muslim, raised in Kenya, etc.) is purely bullshit of the highest order.
That said, albeit "change" is slow and blah-blah-blah, I don't feel he actually intends to change much of anything. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and all that. War powers act, Guantanamo closing, ending of any war(s)...Though to be fair he never said he was interested in ending Afghanistan more than to turn his focus back on it, which he has done, to no discernible result at this point in time anyhow. The U.S. still tortures, the U.S. still spies on it's own people in a once illegal fashion and the attacks in Pakistan, Yemen, and now Libya are war crimes. At least the way we used to define them when laws applied to the leaders (or the super rich).
So, politicians are politicians and everything Obama says will not come to magical, wondrous reality and honestly he may be in for quite a roller coaster but why waste time, this time, on a third party or making your values and beliefs feel extra special when you mark your ballot this particular cycle? Get on the boat, man, this shit ain't about just YOU.This is funny because I now feel that one of the reasons I write these posts is similar to reasons conspiracy theorists get into conspiracy theories; they want to know and they want to be right. I got into political horseshit heavily after 9/11 because I just didn't understand what and why. I had to know why that had happened and somewhere inside I felt like, "if I knew more I would somehow be more prepared!" For what, exactly, I have no idea even to this day...I still keep up as best as I can with "the news" but have come to accept that no amount of knowledge, perspective, information or whatever really makes any tangible difference. This blog doesn't affect anyone or anything really...It's biased opinion, not news, not even particularly well constructed opinion. All it does is allow me to ventilate and momentarily feel like I am in some sort of control, or perhaps in possession of some of "the facts," or some version of "the truth." At least, my version of the truth.
I wonder if you are being unnecessarily stubborn in your own values and beliefs today. I ain't no Democrat and I also voted as many independents as I could in the lower ticket elections but I see no better candidate than Obama. In fact, I have never seen any other candidate ever that was better than Obama on any major ticketI am unnecessarily stubborn in my own values and beliefs everyday. This is about me, standing on my soapbox and typing to the internet heavens! Hence the subtitle referencing "the Pensieve" as this blog really is a place for me to deposit these wondering thoughts and pseudo-reports to placate my inner play-opinion writer. Though I do stand by the notion that "I personally have never seen a better candidate then Obama on any major ticket." He really was an awesome candidate and I wonder if we won't start seeing that guy resurface in the coming year ahead as we close in on the "referendum of Obama in 2012."
Despite my misgivings and loss of passion for him based on his, more or less, predicted centralism, rightward trending and appeasement to the loony conservatives it just seems quite unlikely the republicans or tea party will be able to mount a credible candidate (or alternative). Though it remains fairly hilarious that the right's noise machine still continue to labor under their own delusion that Obama is still somehow the most left-leaning, liberal, socialist President ever to ruin America it also smacks of tragedy as they split themselves into factions all trying to out conservative the most conservative all the while dismissing any memory of 2000-2008.
Which leads me to another of my incorrect 2008 assumptions:
I will even miss Sarah Palin! I have never seen a bigger maroon in public life in all my years and that is including every member of the Bush administration! She is the human version of a Disney ride....It would be like going to the Epcot Center and forming all of your ethical values and ideology based on the songs they sang. Some days I have wondered if she were simply functionally retarded others I wonder if she was built and programmed. Again, assuming they don't win (wonder what the follow up post will look like here if they do?), then she will be one of THE most amusing footnotes of general election history. Hopefully she will get a talk show or something because her mouth opens and comedy gold just spills out.It seemed like I was thinking she would just fade away after the 2008 election, didn't it? Sure, I hoped that she would get a talk show, and she did for a while, but why I didn't think reality show, I will never know?! Now a days I am actively hoping she runs for president, oh the primary debates will be something! Palin, Romney, Gingrich, Haley Barbour, maybe some newly radicalized Huckabee AND the man-droid Tim Pawlenty? They should debate the merits of "science" for like a half hour then launch into the ways in which they will shrink government by deregulating big business. It shall be marvelous! Hell, maybe one of them will actually win!
...The Republicans are really good at two things a) winning elections and b) being the bitchy minority party...And boy howdy how they have succeeded in being the bitchy, party-of-no, minority party! They have done it so thoroughly that they managed to split into almost two groups of GOP and tea party people. Sure, when it comes to voting they are essentially on the same team but when you get into brass tacks they are actually kind of different. Not totally different, just kind of. The most amazing thing though, to me, remains how the GOP continually manipulate the middle class, the poor and the rural, free, independent Americans to keep voting for their rich, asshole rulers who keep rolling back the very regulations that fuck them right out of their shitty low paying, good for nothing jobs. How do I know this? Because I have fallen for the exact same scheme on the left. The Democrats are the team to beat for the Republicans but I think Obama's policies and especially in his financial appointments show that he is on the same side as the Republicans fundamentally. Not our side. In the end, Carlin was right, they don't matter, they are all just figure heads who answer to the bidding of our real masters...Our owners.



